Legal Opinion
United States v. F. Thomas Little, United States of America v. Peter Chernik, United States of America v. Harold Grutchfield
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 15, 1985No. 83-1021, 83-1026 and 83-1032PublishedCited by 170 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
In these three companion appeals, appellants F. Thomas Little, Peter R. Chernik, and Harold Grutchfield challenge their convictions for conspiracy to defraud the United States by impeding, impairing, obstructing and defeating the lawful function of the Internal Revenue Service and Department of Treasury in the collection of tax revenue, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Little, Chernik, and Grutchfield individually and jointly raise numerous issues on appeal. We affirm their convictions.
FACTS
The indictment in this matter stemmed from an IRS undercover investigation of…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by170 opinions
- Kelly Park v. Karen ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Russell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- American Association of Naturopathic Physicians v. Donald C. Hayhurst Jane Doe HayhurstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James E. KESSI, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.