Legal Opinion

City of Searcy v. Roberson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 6, 1954No. 5-539PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"Ward, J.

On March 24, 1948, Avhile Searcy, Arkansas, Avas a city of the second class, its City Council passed Ordinance No. 302 entitled “An Ordinance Establishing Besidential Zones Within the City of Searcy, Arkansas: Begulating and restricting the construction, alteration, repair and addition of buildings therein, and for other purposes.” Among other things the ordinance provided that, within the district outlined therein, it would ‘ ‘ be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to construct, erect, alter, repair or make additions to any structure or building for business or commercial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Little Rock v. BentleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  2. City of Stuttgart v. StraitSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  3. Benton v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Taggart & Taggart Seed Company, Inc. v. City of AugustaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Perry v. County Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. City of Fordyce v. VaughnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Potocki v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Osborne v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API