Legal Opinion
City of Stuttgart v. Strait
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 27, 1947No. 4-8265PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Minor W. Milwee, Justice.
This appeal involves the validity of Ordinance No. 392 of the City of Stuttgart, Arkansas, enacted on August 6, 1946, for the purpose of establishing a building line on the east side of Main Street in said city. The pertinent provisions of the ordinance are contained in §§ 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7, which read as follows:
“Section 1. That no fence or other improvements and no buildings of any description shall be built nearer to the center line of Main Street in said city of Stuttgart, between First Street in said city and Sixth Street in said city, on either side of said…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bain v. Fort Smith Light & Traction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Willis v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- City of Argenta v. KeathSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Bennett v. City of HopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
- Morrilton Waterworks Improvement District v. EarlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Little Rock v. RainesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Perry v. County Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Meyer v. SeifertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Pfeifer v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Springfield v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.