City of Fordyce v. Vaughn
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John I. Purtle, Justice.
This is an appeal from the chancellor’s decree voiding a rezoning ordinance by the City of Fordyce because the city failed to comply procedurally with the zoning ordinance it had adopted earlier. The city argues that the court erred in declaring the ordinance invalid. The appellees dispute the appellants’ argument for reversal, and, by way of counter-appeal insist that Alderman Marvin O’Mary should have refrained from voting because of a conflict of interest and that the action by the City Council was arbitrary and capricious. We hold that the chancellor correctly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Little Rock v. RainesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Maxwell v. Southside School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Taggart & Taggart Seed Company, Inc. v. City of AugustaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Potocki v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- City of Conway v. Housing Authority of ConwaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cosgrove v. City of West MemphisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- City of Little Rock v. PfeiferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Brooks v. City of BentonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Jason Aamodt v. City of Norfork, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Jason Aamodt v. City of Norfork, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.