Legal Opinion

Osborne v. City of Camden

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 26, 1990No. 89-287PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

M.N. Osborne purchased a 33,000 square foot building in Camden. After purchasing the property, he discovered that a zoning line traversed the building at an angle, leaving practically all of the building zoned “neighborhood commercial.” Only a small part of the rear right of the building was zoned “light industrial.” Osborne petitioned the City Planning Commission to zone all of the tract on which the building was located to “light industrial.” The Commission denied his request. He then petitioned the Board of Directors of Camden to overturn the Commission’s zoning…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. GreenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Taggart & Taggart Seed Company, Inc. v. City of AugustaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. City of Searcy v. RobersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  4. Edwards v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1875
  5. Benton v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Craft v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Brooks v. City of BentonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Hatch v. Boulder Town CouncilCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  4. Estate of Houston v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Jason Aamodt v. City of Norfork, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API