Legal Opinion
City of Palm Springs v. Ringwald
California Supreme Court
Decided August 18, 1959No. L. A. 25251PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Petitioner is a general law city governed by a city council. An ordinance was enacted by the council pursuant to the Parking District Law of 1951 (Sts. & Hy. Code, § 35100 et seq.) providing for a proposed parking district to be known as Parking District No. 1 of the city of Palm Springs.
To pay the cost of acquiring property for the parking lots and to construct improvements and install parking meters, the ordinance provides that bonds shall be issued in the amount of $1,400,000. It further provides that the bonds and interest thereon are not to be a debt of the city, or a charge, lien, or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Controversy Between California Toll Bridge Authority & City & County of San Francisco v. WentworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- California Toll Bridge Authority v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- City of Oxnard v. DaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Shelton v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Westbrook v. MihalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Metropolitan Water Dist. v. MarquardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Redondo Beach v. Taxpayers, Property Owners, Etc., City of Redondo BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Conrad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Starr v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.