Legal Opinion
Gomez v. Hug
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided June 3, 1982No. 53,111PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wahl, J.:
In keeping with the duties of a court in ruling on a motion for summary judgment, the “facts” as stated herein are gleaned from the record and are those “facts” viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. They are not a recitation of facts found by the trier of facts from an evidentiary hearing, nor are they a statement of “facts” as this Court believes they should be found by the trier of facts at an evidentiary hearing.
On April 21, 1978, Silvino Gomez was employed as a supervisor at the Shawnee County fairgrounds. His immediate supervisor was the fairgrounds administrator,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Henry W. Kerr v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, John Van Geldern, Real Parties in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Jessie W. Collins v. Cecil Cundy, Campbell County Attorney and Sheriff Hladky, Sheriff of Campbell CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- James L. Bolden, Jr. v. Prc Inc., Formerly Known as Planning Research Corporation, and Robert CarverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Taylor v. MetzgerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Sawyer v. Southwest Airlines Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Hoard v. Shawnee Mission Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Rambo v. CohenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.