Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Roberts
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 10, 1962No. Civ. 26318PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURKE, P. J.—
Appeal from a judgment after demurrer to the second amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend.
The question presented is whether or not a licensed real estate loan broker may recover commissions shared with another who fraudulently represented himself as holding powers of attorney from lenders, but was not licensed to act as a broker or salesman under the Real Estate Act.
The complaint alleged defendant informed plaintiff that he had power of attorney to irrevocably commit lenders to make loans secured by real property and that defendant personally guaranteed these…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Comet Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Holm v. BramwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Houston v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Preach v. Monter RainbowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Merrifield v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Ngan Tang Nguyen v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- California Chicks, Inc. v. ViebrockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Medak v. CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.