Legal Opinion

Erdmann v. Rants

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1989No. Civ. 890075PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINE, Justice.

The question presented is whether a defaulting debtor is entitled to recover statutory damages under NDCC § 41-09-53(1) [UCC 9-507], when repossessed secured property, a consumer good, was sold by the creditors in a commercially reasonable manner, but without prior notice of the sale to the debtor. We hold that the debtor is entitled to statutory damages for the creditors’ failure to give prior notice of the sale and, therefore, we reverse and remand.

Richard and Lorraine Erdmann sold their mobile home, which was subject to a purchase money security interest with a Fargo bank,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. First City Bank-Farmers Branch, Tex. v. GuexTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Community Manage. Ass'n of Colorado Sp. v. TousleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Heller v. HellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Conti Causeway Ford v. JarossyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  5. State Bank of Burleigh County Trust Co. v. All-American Sub, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Healey Ford-Subaru, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Davenport v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  3. Schatke v. SchatkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Coxall v. Clover Commercial Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2004
  5. In Re SCHWALBUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API