Legal Opinion

First City Bank-Farmers Branch, Tex. v. Guex

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1984No. C-2613PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILGARLIN, Justice.

Three issues are presented in this Uniform Commercial Code case involving the rights of a debtor in default when personal property has been given as collateral to secure the loan. First, what constitutes “disposition” of the personal property by the secured party? Second, if the noteholder has disposed of the collateral in violation of UCC provisions, can the debtor recover damages for his actual losses in addition to monetary penalties provided for by statute? Third, are attorney’s fees recoverable under the theory that they are part of the “loss” that the debtor has…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Texas Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Tanenbaum v. Economics Laboratory, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Knebel v. Capital National Bank in AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. First City Bank-Farmers Branch v. Guex, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
  5. Gray-Taylor, Inc. v. TennesseeTexas Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Parkway Co. v. WoodruffTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Holland v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut v. MayfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. PPG Industries, Inc. v. JMB/Houston Centers Partners Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2004

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API