Legal Opinion
Atlas Copco Aktiebolag v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 5, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 234-64PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOLAHAN, District Judge:
Atlas Copco Aktiebolag (“Atlas”) brings this action for alleged infringement of U. S. Letters Patent No. 3,085,-638, issued to Jan Larcen, plaintiff’s assignor, on April 16, 1963, and hereinafter termed the “Larcen patent.” Atlas is a Swedish corporation. It maintains its principal place of business in Sweden, with sales subsidiaries in many other countries, including its American office in New Jersey. The Ingersoll-Rand Company (“Ingersoll”) is a New Jersey corporation, with offices here and principal offices in New York City. Both litigants produce a variety…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lyle/Carlstrom Associates, Inc. v. Manhattan Store Interiors, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Hall v. U. S. Fiber Plastics Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1971
- Keiser v. J. Wiss & Sons Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1972