Legal Opinion
Hall v. U. S. Fiber Plastics Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 30, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 663-67PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOLAHAN, District Judge:
This patent infringement suit involves a variation of the familiar “backyard”, above-ground swimming pool. Plaintiffs charge that similar pools manufactured and sold by defendant are an infringement of Claims 11, 12 and 15 of plaintiffs’ United States Letters Patent No. 3,317,926 (hereinafter “’926”). The application was filed on October 26, 1964, and the patent issued on May 9, 1967 to Raymond L. Hall (hereinafter “Hall”) the inventor-owner and a plaintiff herein. Said patent is exclusively licensed to Quaker City Industries, Inc. (hereinafter “Quaker City”)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Struthers Patent Corp. v. Nestle Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- Raymond L. Hall, and Quaker City Industries, Inc., a Corporation of New York v. U. S. Fiber & Plastics Corporation, a Corporation of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Wahl v. Rexnord, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1979