Legal Opinion
Lyle/Carlstrom Associates, Inc. v. Manhattan Store Interiors, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 28, 1986No. CV 85-4347PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEXLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Lyle/Carlstrom Associates, Inc. (LCA) commenced this action against defendants Manhattan Stores Interiors, Inc. (MSI) and Albert Winters, seeking a declaratory judgment that defendants’ United States Patent No. 4,223,966 (the ’966 patent) is invalid. 1 28 U.S.C. § 2201. MSI contends that the patent is valid and has asserted a counterclaim, alleging that LCA infringed the ’966 patent. After joinder of issue, LCA moved for partial summary judgment on the issue of patent invalidity. Briefs and affidavits were submitted and the parties appeared…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ritchie v. Vast Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Refac International Ltd. v. IBMDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Buildex Inc. v. Kason Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1987
- Intex Recreation Corp. v. Hasbro, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1998