Legal Opinion
Barclay v. Michalsky
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 12, 2006No. 3:04cv1322(JBA)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. # 63]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff instituted this action against her former employer Connecticut Valley Hospital (“CVH”), a division of the State of Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (“DMHAS”) (also a defendant), and two of her former supervisors at CVH, Paula Hughes and Kim Mi-chalsky, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act (“CFEPA”), Conn. GemStat. § 46a-60, et seq., claiming…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rzayeva v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Anderson v. STATE OF NY, OFFICE OF ADMIN.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Caraccilo v. Village of Seneca Falls, NYDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2008
- Paola v. SpadaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Kasprzycki v. DiCarloDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.