Legal Opinion
Paola v. Spada
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 9, 2007No. Civ. 03CV1628 (WWE)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
In his two-count complaint, plaintiff Joseph Paola, a former Connecticut State Trooper with the Department of Public Safety (“DPS”), alleges violation of his constitutional rights pursuant to the First and Fourteenth Amendments by Arthur Spada, Commissioner of DPS, George Luther, formerly the Deputy Commissioner of DPS, and John Blaschik, Deputy State Fire Marshall. Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment as to both counts.
In a ruling dated February 23, 2006, the Court denied the motion for summary judgment as to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Griffin v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Anderson v. STATE OF NY, OFFICE OF ADMIN.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Heffernan v. StraubDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Baker v. GerouldDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Densmore v. City of MaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.