Medo v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ANDERSON, P. J.
This petition raises the question of whether the issue of punitive damages may be tried to a jury which has not determined the liability of the defendant. We conclude that a bifurcation which results in separate juries is prohibited by Civil Code section 3295, subdivision (d). (All further statutory references are to the Civil Code unless otherwise indicated.) We also conclude, however, that real party waived the application of this section and that, therefore, the trial court erred in requiring a retrial of the liability issue. We issue our writ of mandate to require…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cobb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. Superior Court (Clements)California Court of Appeal · 1988
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bullock v. Phillip Morris USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Torres v. Automobile Club of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Notrica v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Abelson v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Barmas, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.