Legal Opinion

Barmas, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 18, 2001No. B150877PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS, J.

Petitioners herein and defendants below, Barmas, Inc., doing business as Hair At Fred Segal, Michael A. Baruch and Paul DeArmas (Baruch hereafter unless context requires otherwise) petition this court for a writ of mandate and/or prohibition or other appropriate relief challenging an order of the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Warren L. Ettinger, judge presiding, granting the motion of plaintiffs and real parties in interest herein, Francesco Galasso and Francesco Galasso, Inc. (plaintiffs hereafter unless context requires otherwise) for a retrial of the question of malice…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brewer v. Second Baptist ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Torres v. Automobile Club of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Valentine v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Cruz v. HomebaseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Medo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bullock v. Phillip Morris USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Huff v. Securitas Sec. Servs. United States, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Holdgrafer v. Unocal Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Newstart Real Estate Inv. LLC v. Huang, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Freden v. Ozel Fine Jewelry CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API