Legal Opinion
Augenstein v. McCormick & Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 27, 1984No. Civ. HM81-1491PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HERBERT F. MURRAY, District Judge.
Presently pending before this Court is defendants’ motion, pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(6), to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Memoranda in support of and in opposition to this motion have been filed by the parties and considered by the Court. A hearing on this motion was held before the Court on February 17, 1984. For the reasons stated herein, defendants’ motion to dismiss will be granted. In light of this dismissal, it is not necessary to consider…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,019 Mary Margaret Ward, Cross-Appellants v. Succession of Richard W. Freeman, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Rosengarten v. BuckleyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1985
- Sherman v. Johnson & Towers Baltimore, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1990
- In Re Atlantic Financial Management, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
- Pinder v. Commissioners of CambridgeDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1993