Legal Opinion
Pinder v. Commissioners of Cambridge
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 10, 1993No. Civ. N-92-675PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NORTHROP, Senior District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Paper No. 5). This motion is opposed (Paper No. 6). After a review of all briefs filed and in consideration of the arguments presented by counsel at hearing, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
More specifically, the Court will deny Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Constitutional violations alleged in Counts I and II under the equal protection and substantive due process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court also will deny Defendants’ motion to…
2Cases cited105 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pinder v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Soto v. CarrasquilloDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1995
- Davis v. Fulton County, Ark.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1995
- Pinder v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Smith v. City of ElyriaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.