Legal Opinion
James v. Board of Dental Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 2, 1985No. F004223PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANSON (P. D.), J.
The Board of Dental Examiners, by accusation and a supplemental accusation, charged Thomas W. James, D.M.D., with negligence, incompetence and inefficiency in the treatment of six dental patients. An administrative law judge (ALJ) held a four-day hearing and by proposed decision found for Dr. James on one claim; found that clear and convincing evidence supported claims of abandonment as to one patient; incompetence as to two other patients; and negligence as to two remaining patients. The ALJ also determined each of the above acts constituted unprofessional conduct.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Franz v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Swars v. Council of City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Fresno City High School District v. De CaristoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kearl v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Khan v. Medical BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Danigeles v. Illinois Department of Financial & Professional RegulationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Gillis v. Dental BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Angelier v. State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.