Legal Opinion
Correll v. Distinctive Dental Services, P.A.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 28, 1999No. C7-98-2251PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI ** , Judge
Appellant Distinctive Dental Services, P.A. (DDS) appeals the district court’s denial of its motion to compel arbitration of respondent Bryan Correll’s marital status discrimination claim. The district court interpreted Minn.Stat. § 368.11 (1998) to preclude arbitration of a pending discrimination claim pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 363.06 (1998), and it concluded that neither the Federal Arbitration Act nor the Minnesota Uniform Arbitration Act compels arbitration of Correll’s claim. We disagree and reverse the decision of the district court.
FACTS
On February 4, 1994, DDS…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Correll v. Distinctive Dental Services, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Correll v. Distinctive Dental Services, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001