Legal Opinion

Correll v. Distinctive Dental Services, P.A.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 11, 2001No. C4-01-1005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

By writ of certiorari, relator Bryan Cor-rell challenges an administrative law judge’s (ALJ) denial of his request for attorney fees under Minn.Stat. § 363.071, subd. 2 (2000). Correll had filed a complaint with respondent Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Human Rights, alleging that respondent Distinctive Dental Services, P.A. (Distinctive Dental) unlawfully discriminated against him on the basis of his marital status. Because the ALJ has broad authority to award attorney fees under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), Minn.Stat. §§ 363.01-.20 (2000), and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Red Roof Franchising, LLC v. AA Hospitality Northshore, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API