Legal Opinion

Rynearson v. Union County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1909PublishedCited by 14 opinions

This is an appeal by Union County from a proceeding wherein judgment was rendered, sustaining a writ of review and setting aside an order of the county court vacating a part of a county road, from which judgment defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

1. This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment that sustained a writ of review and set aside an order of the county court of Union County vacating a part of a county road. ' The order referred to was annulled on the ground that notices of the application were not posted for the time required therefor, though such alleged defect was not assigned as error in the petition for a writ of review. The return of the writ sets forth a copy of the notices informing all persons that application to vacate a part of such highway would be made to such county court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Luis v. MuhrbackOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Evans v. ChristianOregon Supreme Court · 1873
  3. State ex rel. Mahoney v. McKinnonOregon Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Curran v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Huffman v. HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. McEwen v. McEwenOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Hodgdon v. GoodspeedOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Watson v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Kirk v. WoodsOregon Supreme Court · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API