Legal Opinion

Curran v. State

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1909PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From Linn: William Galloway, Judge. This is a special proceeding to review a judgment convicting Charles Curran, for an alleged violation of the local option liquor law, and upon conviction thereof he was adjudged to pay a fine of $100 and costs. From an order dismissing the proceedings, petitioner, Charles Curran, appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

This is a special proceeding to review the judgment of an inferior court. The petition for the writ sets forth the facts relating to the commencement of a criminal *156action in a justice’s court for Linn County against the plaintiff herein, Charles Curran, for an alleged violation of the local option liquor law, and states that upon conviction thereof he was adjudged to pay a fine of $100 and the costs incurred in the prosecution. The petition contains certain assertions in relation to the plea of guilty that was entered, sets forth the reasons for interposing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sanders v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Morton v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  3. People v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Gardner v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Barton v. La GrandeOregon Supreme Court · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Enter. Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Sustar v. County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State v. Lee LimUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State Ex Rel. Foot v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1928

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API