Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Mahoney v. McKinnon
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1880PublishedCited by 27 opinions
Appeal from Douglas County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Watson, J.:
It appears from the transcript that this was a proceeding for contempt, under tit. 4, of chap. 7, of the Civil Code, based upon the following affidavit and motion:
“In the circuit court for the county of Douglas, State of Oregon.
“State oe Oregon, ex. rel. J. W. Mahoney, Plaintiff, v. J. D. McKinnon, Alva Pike, J. H. Shupe, E. J. Page, and Geo. B. Sacry, defendants.
“Action at law to prevent the usurpation of office.
*488“ State of Oregon, County of Douglas, ss.:
“ I, William E. Willis, being duly sworn, say I am attorney for plaintiff above named; that said plaintiff did, on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hutton v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Evans v. ChristianOregon Supreme Court · 1873
- Hollingsworth v. State ex rel. HarveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
- Taylor v. MoffattIndiana Supreme Court · 1830
- Dolph v. NickumOregon Supreme Court · 1867
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Iwanicki v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- State Ex Rel. Bassett v. BassettOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Maxwell v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Herbert v. DufurOregon Supreme Court · 1893
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.