Michael Amos v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANNE GARDNER, JUSTICE
A jury found Appellant Michael Amos guilty of the offense of cruelty to a nonli-vestock animal. After finding an enhancement paragraph true, the jury assessed Appellant’s punishment at thirty-one months’ confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 1 Appellant asserts five issues in which he attacks, respectively, (1) the admission of a State’s witness’s recorded statement to the police, (2) the denial of his motion to quash the indictment, (3) the denial of six of his challenges for cause, (4) the denial of his objection…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- McDuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Leday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.