Legal Opinion

Drovers' National Bank v. Blue

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1896PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to .Wexford; Aldricb, J. Assumpsit by the Drovers’ National Bank against George W. Blue on a promissory note. A justice’s judgment was reversed on certiorari in the circuit court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff commenced this action in justice’s court, and obtained judgment, which was reversed *32by the circuit court upon certiorari. It is here upon writ of error.

The case was first tried by a jury, the result being a disagreement. After the discharge of the jury, the parties stipulated in writing that the case might be decided by the justice upon the proofs taken upon the trial, all questions raised upon such trial to be saved to the respective parties, the same as though the proceedings upon such trial had been repeated before the justice. The stipulation takes the case out from the rule…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dresser v. Missouri & Iowa Railway Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Mann v. Second National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. Fox v. Bank of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. Rice v. RankansMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Hollenburg v. ShuffertMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. McNight v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Union National Bank v. WinsorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. City Deposit Bank v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Anthon State Bank v. BernardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. Fredonia National Bank v. TommeiMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API