Union National Bank v. Winsor
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Mille Lacs county to recover $840 upon a promissory note executed by the twelve defendants. The case was tried before Searle, J., who directed the jury to return a verdict in favor of plaintiff. From an order denying a new trial, Taylor, J., defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The Union National Bank of Columbus, Ohio, brought an action against Samuel Winsor and eleven other persons to recover the sum of $840 and interest thereon, alleged to be due upon a certain promissory note dated June 11, 1902, due July 1, 1905, signed by the defendants, payable to McLaughlin Bros., and by said payees claimed to have been transferred, sold, and assigned for a good and valuable consideration to the bank before maturity. The answer denied that the bank was a bona fide purchaser of the note for value before maturity, and alleged that the note was obtained by McLaughlin Bros,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dresser v. Missouri & Iowa Railway Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Citizens' State Bank v. . CowlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Mann v. Second National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Thompson v. Sioux Falls National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Drovers' National Bank v. BlueMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sherrill v. Merchants & Mechanics T. & S. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Winter v. NobsIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- Estate of Philpott v. PhilpottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Bland v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1916
- Cashion v. Bank of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1926
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.