Legal Opinion

Fox v. Bank of Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1883PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error from, Lyon District Court. Action brought by the Bank of Kansas City against Fox and the First National Bank of Emporia, upon a promissory note. Trial at the September Term, 1882, of the district court, and judgment for the plaintiff bank, against defendant Fox, who brings the case here. The opinion States the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This was an action brought by defendant in error, plaintiff below, upon a promissory note, which, with its indorsements, reads as follows:

“$346. Emporia, Kansas, January 7, 1881.

February 14, 1881, for value received, I promise to pay to the order of L. Severy three hundred and forty-six & no-100 dollars, at the First national bank of Emporia, with interest, at the rate of twelve per cent, per annum after maturity until paid; also cost of collection, including reasonable attorney’s fees, if suit be instituted on this note.

I. D. Fox.

No. 9812.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Hamilton v. MarksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. Spooner v. HolmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Swift v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Howry v. EppingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Haug v. RileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Dedham National Bank v. Everett National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. People's Bank of Minneapolis v. ReidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Drovers' National Bank v. BlueMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Manufacturers' National Bank of Racine v. NewellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API