Legal Opinion

Staton v. . Mullis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1885PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Civil ActioN for the possession of land, heard before MacRae, Judge, and a jury, at Spring Term, 1884, of UNION Superior Court. The facts appear fully in the opinion. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

In support of his title to the land iu dispute, the plaintiff introduced a grant from the State, issued on the 20th day of December, 1799, to Francis Coburn, and successive deeds from him to the plaintiff. The last in the series is a deed made on May 3, 1832, by Frederick Staton to his son, the plaintiff, purporting to convey a tract of five hundred acres, parcel of the original grant. Objection was made to the admission in evidence of the grant and of the two deeds, more especially that from John Cobb to Vernal Adams for two hundred acres, executed in October; 1814, upon various grounds that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gudger v. . HensleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  2. Davis v. . HigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. Stell v. . BarhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. Allen v. . BowenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  5. Osborne v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ruffin v. . OverbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. McLean v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Hicks v. . BullockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. State v. . McDuffieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Currie v. . GilchristSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API