Legal Opinion

City of Bridgeton v. Missouri-American Water Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 17, 2007No. SC 87744PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM RAY PRICE, JR., Judge.

The City of Bridgeton (“Bridgeton”) plans to expand and improve a city street called Taussig Road. Bridgeton’s costs for the project will be paid by a private developer, TRiSTAR Business Communities, LLC (“TRiSTAR”), in exchange for the city’s approval of a TRiSTAR project. The Taussig Road project requires the relocation of certain water mains, pipes, and fire hydrants installed and maintained by Missouri-American Water Company (“Missouri-American”). This lawsuit concerns whether Bridgeton or Missouri-American must pay the costs of relocating the water…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. State Upon the Information of McKittrick v. Missouri Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  3. State ex inf. Danforth v. State Environmental Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  4. Missouri Public Service Co. v. Platte-Clay Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  5. Bowers v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whisenhunt v. Southwestern Bell TelephoneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. St. Charles County v. Laclede Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  3. Joe Whisenhunt v. Southwestern Bell TelephoneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API