City of Bridgeton v. Missouri-American Water Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM RAY PRICE, JR., Judge.
The City of Bridgeton (“Bridgeton”) plans to expand and improve a city street called Taussig Road. Bridgeton’s costs for the project will be paid by a private developer, TRiSTAR Business Communities, LLC (“TRiSTAR”), in exchange for the city’s approval of a TRiSTAR project. The Taussig Road project requires the relocation of certain water mains, pipes, and fire hydrants installed and maintained by Missouri-American Water Company (“Missouri-American”). This lawsuit concerns whether Bridgeton or Missouri-American must pay the costs of relocating the water…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State Upon the Information of McKittrick v. Missouri Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- State ex inf. Danforth v. State Environmental Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- Missouri Public Service Co. v. Platte-Clay Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Bowers v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Whisenhunt v. Southwestern Bell TelephoneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- St. Charles County v. Laclede Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- Joe Whisenhunt v. Southwestern Bell TelephoneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009