Legal Opinion

Whisenhunt v. Southwestern Bell Telephone

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 17, 2009No. 08-3542PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Joe and Margaret Whisenhunt sought a declaratory judgment that Southwestern Bell Telephone (AT & T) must bear the cost of relocating utilities to accommodate the construction of certain streets within the city of Little Rock in connection with the Whisenhunts’ development of real property. The Whisenhunts appeal from the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment to AT & T. We affirm.

I

The Whisenhunts sold approximately fifty acres of land to Fellowship Bible Church and entered into an agreement with the church to develop some eleven adjacent acres owned by the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Nitro Distributing, Inc. v. Alticor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. Craighead Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Craighead CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Fjelstad v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  2. Brinkman v. Nasseff Mechanical Contractors Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
  3. Weber v. TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INS. CO.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
  4. Buzzell v. Citizens Automobile Finance, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
  5. General Mills Operations, LLC v. Five Star Custom Foods, Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API