Legal Opinion

Caudle v. Swanson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 30, 1958No. 378PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

There is no exception to the issues submitted to the jury. The jury found by their answer to the first issue that the plaintiff had no contract as contended for by him to build the defendants’ home. The trial court in its charge to the jury on the second issue, which is what amount, if any, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendants, declared and explained the law arising on the evidence if the jury found that the contract between the parties was as contended for by the plaintiff, did likewise if the jury found that the contract between the parties was as contended for by the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Mohr v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Pearson v. YewdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. O'Connor v. PapertsianNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Dorsey v. BarbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Jehl v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Drummond v. Mid-West Growers Cooperative Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Gosselin v. Better Homes, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
  5. Freeman v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API