Legal Opinion
Bonilla-Bukhari v. Berryhill
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided March 4, 2019No. 18 Civ. 263 (GWG)PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff Maribel Bonilla-Bukhari ("Bonilla-Bukhari") brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner") denying her claim for Supplemental Security Income and Disability Insurance Benefits under the Social Security Act (the "Act"). Both parties have moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c).1 For the reasons stated below, Bonilla-Bukhari's motion for remand is denied and the Commissioner's motion…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brault v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Muhammad v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Adames v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Blaney v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
- Byrne v. BerryhillDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Caruso v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.