United States v. Shelwood
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARDS, Judge:
Appellant has assigned four errors before this Court:
I
THE COURT-MARTIAL ORDER ERRONEOUSLY RECITES THE SENTENCE.
II
APPELLANT’S REQUEST FOR TRIAL BY MILITARY JUDGE ALONE WAS NOT “UNDERSTANDINGLY MADE” (MCM, 1969 (REV.), PARA. 53d) AND THEREFORE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE MILITARY JUDGE.
Ill
PROSECUTION EXHIBIT 2 (A AND B) WERE INADMISSIBLE OVER DEFENSE OBJECTION ABSENT ANY SHOWING THAT APPELLANT HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO REBUT THE ADVERSE SERVICE RECORD ENTRIES OR EVEN KNEW OF THE EXISTENCE OF ONE OF THEM.
*756IV
THE APPROVED SENTENCE IS INAPPROPRIATELY SEVERE.
We agree with…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. UsryU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. BrownU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. VickersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. ShelwoodUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. VickersU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. AndersonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. PhillipsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.