Legal Opinion

United States v. Shelwood

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided January 29, 1981No. NCM 80 0187PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARDS, Judge:

Appellant has assigned four errors before this Court:

I

THE COURT-MARTIAL ORDER ERRONEOUSLY RECITES THE SENTENCE.

II

APPELLANT’S REQUEST FOR TRIAL BY MILITARY JUDGE ALONE WAS NOT “UNDERSTANDINGLY MADE” (MCM, 1969 (REV.), PARA. 53d) AND THEREFORE SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE MILITARY JUDGE.

Ill

PROSECUTION EXHIBIT 2 (A AND B) WERE INADMISSIBLE OVER DEFENSE OBJECTION ABSENT ANY SHOWING THAT APPELLANT HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO REBUT THE ADVERSE SERVICE RECORD ENTRIES OR EVEN KNEW OF THE EXISTENCE OF ONE OF THEM.

*756IV

THE APPROVED SENTENCE IS INAPPROPRIATELY SEVERE.

We agree with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. UsryU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
  2. United States v. BrownU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. VickersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. ShelwoodUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. VickersU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
  4. United States v. AndersonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981
  5. United States v. PhillipsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API