Legal Opinion

United States v. Usry

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided May 23, 1980No. NCM 79 1894PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARDS, Judge:

This case originally came before us without specific assignment of error. We have asked appellate counsel for, and received, briefs on the issue of appropriateness of the sentence. In carrying out our statutory duties, we must be convinced that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact. We have no quarrel with our brother in his concurring/dissenting opinion that such duty requires us not to approve any sentence which, in view of the entire record, we conclude is not fair and just. Article 66c, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). In the…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. BaierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  2. United States v. RojasU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983
  3. United States v. LeprestiNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  4. United States v. StefanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  5. United States v. HutchinsonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API