Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Phillips

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided February 26, 1982No. NMCM 81 2891Published

1DissentBaum, Senior Judge

Appellant has assigned one error before this Court contending that prosecution exhibit 3, a Navy Occupation/Training and Awards History record (NAVPERS 1070/604) admitted into evidence over appellant’s objection, contains adverse personal opinion concerning him and that he should have been warned of and given the opportunity to rebut the entry pursuant to Article 1110, U. S. Navy Regulations, 1973, and Bureau of Naval Personnel Manual (BUPERSMAN) Article 5030420.

The complained of prosecution exhibit 3 indicates that appellant was “dropped for motivation” from Naval Submarine School.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BrownU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
  2. United States v. ShelwoodU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API