Legal Opinion

United States v. Anderson

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided September 21, 1981No. NMCM 80 2052PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERCHEVAL, Judge.

Appellant asserts two assignments of error for our consideration. The first, a jurisdictional issue, is summarily rejected in accordance with United States v. Stone, 8 M.J. 140 (C.M.A.1979). We find, however, appellant’s second assignment to have merit.

In his second assignment appellant asserts as error the introduction into evidence of Prosecution Exhibits 1 and 2 during the presentencing stage of his trial. Prosecution Exhibit 1 was an Enlisted Performance Evaluation and Prosecution Exhibit 2 was a Page 13 from appellant’s service record. The basis of appellant’s assertion…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  4. United States v. MackUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  5. United States v. MasusockUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. CorcoranUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. HoxsieU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. DonohueU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API