State of Arizona v. Anthony Benard Primous
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE BOLICK,
opinion of the Court:
¶ 1 We consider whether police can form a reasonable suspicion that an individual is engaged in criminal activity and is armed and dangerous, thus justifying a pat-down search, based merely on where they encounter the individual (e.g., a “high-crime neighborhood”) and a companion’s flight. Viewing the totality of the circumstances, we hold that the police here did not have an individualized reasonable suspicion sufficient to justify the pat-down search of Anthony Benard Primous; therefore, the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Kenneth Wayne Thompson IIArizona Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- State of Arizona v. Preston Alton StrongArizona Supreme Court · 2024
- State of Arizona v. Ian MitchamArizona Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. BotchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.