Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Anthony Benard Primous

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2017No. CR-16-0205-PRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE BOLICK,

opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 We consider whether police can form a reasonable suspicion that an individual is engaged in criminal activity and is armed and dangerous, thus justifying a pat-down search, based merely on where they encounter the individual (e.g., a “high-crime neighborhood”) and a companion’s flight. Viewing the totality of the circumstances, we hold that the police here did not have an individualized reasonable suspicion sufficient to justify the pat-down search of Anthony Benard Primous; therefore, the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Kenneth Wayne Thompson IIArizona Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  3. State of Arizona v. Preston Alton StrongArizona Supreme Court · 2024
  4. State of Arizona v. Ian MitchamArizona Supreme Court · 2024
  5. State v. BotchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API