Legal Opinion

City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Independent Highway District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 2003No. 27441PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment holding that because the City of Sandpoint had established a functioning street department, it and not the Sandpoint Independent Highway District has control over all of the streets within the city limits. We reverse the judgment of the district court.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

This is a continuation of an ongoing dispute between the City of Sandpoint (City) and the Sandpoint Independent Highway District (Highway District) over which entity has responsibility for the maintenance of the City’s streets. The City was initially organized as a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Infanger v. City of SalmonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Thomson v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. HartIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Hansen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Jen-Rath Co. v. Kit Manufacturing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. City of Idaho Falls, an Idaho Mun. Corp. v. H-K Contractors, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Paolini v. Albertson's Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In the Matter of AdoptionIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Blickenstaff v. CleggIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Brown v. Marvin G.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API