Legal Opinion

Paolini v. Albertson's Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 2006No. 32495PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

We have accepted questions of law certified by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals asking us whether stock options constitute wages under Chapter 6 of Title 45, Idaho Code, and whether terminating an employee for trying to exercise his right to receive wages violates Idaho’s public policy exception to at-will employment. We answer the first question in the negative, which renders the second question moot.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Brace Paolini was an employee of Albert-son’s, Inc. (Albertson’s) for seventeen years. During that time he received several thousand stock…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Independent Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Carrier v. Lake Pend Oreille School District 84Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
  3. McLean v. Maverik Country Stores, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Goff v. H.J.H. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Whitlock v. Haney Seed Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Weems v. Citigroup, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Farber v. Idaho State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Johnson v. McPheeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Wernecke v. St. Maries Joint School District 401Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc. v. MagillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API