Legal Opinion

Arizona v. Mauro

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 26, 1987No. 85-2121PublishedCited by 364 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Powell

While respondent in this case was in police custody, he indicated that he did not wish to answer any questions until a lawyer was present. The issue presented is whether, in the circumstances of this case, officers interrogated respondent in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments when they allowed him to speak with his wife in the presence of a police officer.

I

On November 23, 1982, the Flagstaff Police Department received a telephone call from a local K mart store. The caller stated that a man had entered the store claiming to have killed his son. When officers reached the store,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by364 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. LegerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  3. People v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Woodward v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  5. United States v. Francisco Sangineto-Miranda, (87-5667) Luray Betts, (87-5668) Enrique Vargas, (87-5711) & Benjamin Nelson, (87-5712)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

359 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API