Legal Opinion

Maloney v. City of Grand Forks

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1944No. File No. 6935PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

This is an action to recover for injuries received while walking on a sidewalk. The jury found for the plaintiff. A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial was denied. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff and from the order denying judgment notwithstanding the verdict and denying a new trial and from the judgment entered defendant appeals. The question is narrowed to one general issue — is any liability of the city shown?

The material facts bearing on this question are: The plaintiff in walking in a southerly direction on South Fourth Street on January 1, 1942,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Beltz v. . City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Todd v. . City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Bagg v. Otter Tail Power Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Sears v. Town of GreenfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Tudor v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Diegel v. City of West FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Lindenberg v. FolsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  3. McCullagh v. FortuneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Parker v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  5. Huus v. RingoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API