Legal Opinion

Froh v. Hein

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1949No. File 7127PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries arising as the result of the collision of two automobiles. Plaintiff Walter Froh, brought the action on behalf of himself personally and as guardian ad litem for his minor son, Walter Froh, Jr. He alleged in his complaint that his son Walter Froh, Jr. while riding as a guest in an automobile driven by the defendant DeLane Hein received personal injuries which were proximately caused by the gross negligence of DeLane Hein. He asked damages .in the sum of $7,500.00 for personal, injuries to his son, $1,500.00 for loss of wages suffered by his…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Leonard v. North Dakota Co-Operative Wool Marketing Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Burdick v. MannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Armstrong v. McDonaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Bolton v. WellsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Haslam v. BabcockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Grenz v. WerreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Larson v. MeyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  3. King v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Moe v. KettwigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Umphrey Ex Rel. Umphrey v. DeeryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API