New York State National Organization for Women v. Terry
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Defendants, a group committed to antiabortion protests and individuals affiliated with the group, have moved, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint and plaintiff-intervenor’s complaint. Plaintiffs, a coalition of women’s organizations and abortion providers, have moved for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R. Civ.P., and they seek a permanent injunction prohibiting defendants from blocking access to medical facilities where abortions are performed. Plaintiff-intervenor, the City of New…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- New York State National Organization for Women v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Pro-Choice Network v. Project Rescue Western New YorkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1992
- National Organization for Women v. Operation RescueDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1989
- Volunteer Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Operation RescueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Roe v. Operation RescueDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.