Legal Opinion

Wolfson v. Mills

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 14, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHehbe, J.

Defendants served a demand for a bill of particulars. Plaintiffs refused to answer some of the questions propounded, and defendants now move to compel full compliance with the demand. The questions made the subject of this motion may be grouped under three heads.

Class I: Questions numbered 1 to 4, 7 to 11, 32 to 41, 67 to 76, and 100 to 105. They were framed to elicit more specific information respecting the nature and extent of the injuries claimed to have been sustained by plaintiffs. Plaintiffs answered these inquiries merely by making reference to the allegations of the complaint.

Class…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tilton v. . BeecherNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Taylor v. Security Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Watkins v. CopeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  4. Hopper v. GillettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barnes v. P. D. Manufacturing Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  2. Lókpez Finlay v. LókpezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1945
  3. Adjustment Department v. BrostromWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Tierney v. TierneyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  5. Walter v. BenderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API