Legal Opinion

Jewett v. Ayres

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 24, 1914PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Certiorari to Polk District Court. Appeal having been taken from a finding of the board of supervisors that a statement of consent for the sale of intoxicating liquor was sufficient, the complainant moved for an assignment of the cause for trial at the pending or next succeeding term. The motion was denied, and upon such ruling writ of certiorari was brought to this court.

1Opinion of the CourtWithrow, J.

I. A petition or statement of consent for the sale of intoxicating liquor in the city of Des Moines was in December, 1913, held by the board of supervisors of Polk county to be sufficient. Thereafter on December 26, 1913, a general denial of the- sufficiency of the petition of consent was *432filed, and this was accompanied by a cost bond, as required by Code Supplement, section 2450. On the 2d day of January, 1914, the county auditor certified the statement of consent to the clerk of the district court, by the-filings previously noted appeal to that court having been perfected, and on the 5th…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tiedt v. CarstensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  2. Home Savings & Trust Co. v. District Court of Pole CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. Smith v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  4. Butterfield v. TreichlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  5. Polk County v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Massey v. City Council of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  2. Gaffney v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Dunphy v. City Council of City of CrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  4. Ebert v. ShortSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  5. McCarthy Co. v. Dubuque District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API