San Francisco & Fresno Land Co. v. Hartung
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. Jones & O’Donnell, and Sullivan & Sullivan, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, C.
This is a suit to quiet plaintiff’s title to the land described in the complaint and to recover its possession. The plaintiffs had judgment, from which and from an order denying their motion for a new trial the defendants appeal. The points urged by appellants’ counsel are, in effect,—1. Error in admitting in evidence a deed of conveyance, of date June 18, 1898, from the city and county of San Francisco to the plaintiffs; 2. Insufficiency of the evidence to justify the finding of title in the plaintiffs; 3. Insufficiency of the findings on the issue of defendants’ adverse possession,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cannon v. StockmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Mack v. JastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- State v. ConklingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Collins v. O'LavertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Young v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Standard Salt & Cement Co. v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Vragnizan v. Savings Union Bank & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
- Lampton v. Davis Standard Bread Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Thelen v. VogelMontana Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.