People v. Pierce
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Ontario County Court (Craig J. Doran, J.), entered January 21, 2005. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). The sole contention of defendant on appeal is that County Court erred in assessing 20 points against him based on the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. RolandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. SinclairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. RatcliffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. CarlisleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. FieneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008