Legal Opinion
People v. Santiago
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 1, 2005PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), entered December 29, 2003. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ordered that the order insofar as appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed in the exercise of discretion without costs and defendant is determined to be a level two risk.
Memorandum: We conclude that County Court improvidently exercised its discretion in determining that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA]…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. GuamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Chemical Bank v. Von BulowNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re the Appointment of a Guardian of the Person & Property of NimonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. KearnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. WeatherleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. BelileAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. PierceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.